Different ride height between a '66 F100 & a '68 F100...

Suspension, steering, brakes, wheels & tires

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
crashdummy
New Member
New Member
Posts: 20
Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2014 8:34 pm
Location: South Carolina

Different ride height between a '66 F100 & a '68 F100...

Post by crashdummy »

Just wondering...

Why would my brothers '68 be so much taller than my '66. Both are stock.
Have a great Ford day!

The few Fords I've owned-
1966 F100, 240, 3M
1967 Galaxie 500 XL, 390, Auto
1986 Bronco, 351W, 4M
1988 Mustang GT, 5.0, 5M
1989 Mustang LX, 5.0, 5M
2001 Ranger XLT, 4.0, Auto
2003 MACH 1, 4.6, 5M
2004 MACH 1, 4.6, 5M
2004 F150 Supercrew Lariat, 5.4, Auto
2004 F250 Harley-Davidson, 6.0, Auto
User avatar
chad67
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 680
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2012 11:21 am
Location: Sullivan, MO

Re: Different ride height between a '66 F100 & a '68 F100...

Post by chad67 »

Over the years, the springs in either truck may have been replaced. Also, springs loose rate, and ride height lowers, during use. Factors like the condition of roads traveled, loads carried, and mileage all affect the rate at which a spring fatigues.
1967 F100 SWB
1991 Thunderbird 5.0 with fully ported gt40 heads, cobra intake (also ported) and a trickflow stage 2 cam, manual steering, and custom 3" exhaust
User avatar
elgemcdlf
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1855
Joined: Mon Nov 01, 2010 2:04 pm
Location: Ringgold, GA

Re: Different ride height between a '66 F100 & a '68 F100...

Post by elgemcdlf »

Could be optical illusion as well. The Slicks are smaller trucks.
Post Reply