Why we will never have a dropped spindle for the Twin I-Beam

Suspension, steering, brakes, wheels & tires

Moderator: FORDification

Post Reply
User avatar
MadMaxetc
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: Kansas, Wichita
Contact:

Why we will never have a dropped spindle for the Twin I-Beam

Post by MadMaxetc »

I was thinking about it the other day and I thought I would take a look into it.

Picture 1 Picture 2

Here are my thoughts... :roll:

First let me say that the position of the caliper and the mounting of the backing plate are some what minor issues compared to the following...

If you look at the way this thing is built you can see that the actual shaft is pressed into a cast body. Then it is smashed on the back side to keep it from coming out. This means that you have to have access to the back side of the hole.
If you look at the picture, you can see that the upper bearing is right where you would want the shaft to be for a 2" drop. So if you take the current design the most you could probably do is a 0.5" drop. That is hardly enough to be worth it. :(

Well what if we cast the shaft into the spindle!! :P

Well the problem becomes one of strength and bearing loads. The bearings would be all wrong. Right now the bearings are loaded fairly equal. If you move the rotational axis up 2" then the lower bearing would only carry about 25% and the upper one would carry 75%! :shock: this would mean that your king pin bearings would only last about 2/3rds as long, assuming that the would wear at the same rate. (they would probably wear faster!)
Now about the shaft being cast. I do not think that a cast shaft would hold up to the stress. I think it would have to be a forged spindle. It would also be difficult to machine the shaft, as the spindle would be off balance to the shaft.
So I think for those reasons, and the fact that forgings are expensive, that path is a no go as well. :(

I am out of Ideas on it for now... :2cents:

What are your guy’s thoughts?
Dan

Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4 / Work In Progress!
Daily Driver: '67 F-250 Converted to F-100 LWB / 300 / T-5 / 9" 3.70:1 / 235/75R15 Tires
1/4 mile in 17.64s @ 75mph (it's 4200lbs!!!)
"Work Harder! Millions On Welfare Depend On YOU!!"

FORD Girl

Photobucket Pictures
Tim P.
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 666
Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2004 1:16 am
Location: West Michigan area
Contact:

re: Why we will never have a dropped spindle for the Twin I-

Post by Tim P. »

Im not an expert in this area but heres a thought what if you delete the whole twin I beam system go with a straight axel with leafs and flip the axel as the straight axels spindles are off set about 4 or 5" from center plane of the main axel that would give you a good drop but then Im sure that there are other changes needing to be done to make this work as a system like steering brakes setup etc. I might just be rattling on here but this is what I pick my brain only but a momet to come up with this. :roll:
Ford Is The Mountain That The Rock fell Off Of.

72 F-250 Camper Special 390 Stroker 419 CID 420 HP Natural Asp 200 HP NOS C-6 Dana 60 4.10
96 F-150 XLT 4X4 5.8 Heavy Duty 4EOD
User avatar
MadMaxetc
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: Kansas, Wichita
Contact:

re: Why we will never have a dropped spindle for the Twin I-

Post by MadMaxetc »

That may work.

I was simply trying to explane why the Twin I will not have droped sindles.

You can always swap to another suspention design and fabricate it to make it work.
Dan

Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4 / Work In Progress!
Daily Driver: '67 F-250 Converted to F-100 LWB / 300 / T-5 / 9" 3.70:1 / 235/75R15 Tires
1/4 mile in 17.64s @ 75mph (it's 4200lbs!!!)
"Work Harder! Millions On Welfare Depend On YOU!!"

FORD Girl

Photobucket Pictures
User avatar
snake
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 254
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:20 pm
Location: Eastern Iowa

re: Why we will never have a dropped spindle for the Twin I-

Post by snake »

MadMax -

I agree! I brought up the same factors that you did in a thread a few weeks ago and the discussion got even further involved. I'll see if I can find it (remember the title) for you to review.......
User avatar
snake
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 254
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:20 pm
Location: Eastern Iowa

re: Why we will never have a dropped spindle for the Twin I-

Post by snake »

Here's a link to the previous discussion....

http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... hp?t=18196

The discussion about dropped spindles starts several posts down into the topic......
User avatar
MadMaxetc
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: Kansas, Wichita
Contact:

re: Why we will never have a dropped spindle for the Twin I-

Post by MadMaxetc »

Ha HA HA! I posted on the subject and don't even remember!

Oh well. I am still thinking about this. If You make an I-Beam and Sindle Set it might be posible. :o

more to come I am sure...
Dan

Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4 / Work In Progress!
Daily Driver: '67 F-250 Converted to F-100 LWB / 300 / T-5 / 9" 3.70:1 / 235/75R15 Tires
1/4 mile in 17.64s @ 75mph (it's 4200lbs!!!)
"Work Harder! Millions On Welfare Depend On YOU!!"

FORD Girl

Photobucket Pictures
User avatar
FORDification
Site & Forum Admin
Site & Forum Admin
Posts: 8050
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Kansas, Wellsville
Contact:

re: Why we will never have a dropped spindle for the Twin I-

Post by FORDification »

The laws of physics shouldn't apply here. Doesn't this fall into the "if we can put a man on the moon why can't we...." rhetoric? :evil:

Thanks for the brainstorming though, guys. What you say does make sense, though it's not what I wanna hear. :pout:
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
ImageImageImage
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
Jake11
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 826
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2005 1:31 am

re: Why we will never have a dropped spindle for the Twin I-

Post by Jake11 »

The axle needs more offset, not spindle, No? The spindle has not very
much meat on it to work with. A section of plate could be used to weld
a cut axle if it was gusseted and done right. :wink:
Leadfoot
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 336
Joined: Thu Mar 02, 2006 8:21 pm
Location: CANADA, BC VAN. ISLAND
Contact:

re: Why we will never have a dropped spindle for the Twin I-

Post by Leadfoot »

:? why drop the spindle when you can drop the beam? and if you did drop the spindle would you not run in to the radius rod?
WHAT ?
User avatar
snake
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 254
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2005 12:20 pm
Location: Eastern Iowa

re: Why we will never have a dropped spindle for the Twin I-

Post by snake »

In my opinion, the biggest problem/concern with the dropped I beams is the tie-rod relocator (those don't look real sound to me). Obviously, the more drop you have in the I beam, the more offset you need in the tie-rod relocator.

A big benefit from a dropped spindle is the elimination of the need for the tie-rod relocator. But as noted above and in the link above, I don't think dropped spindles will ever come about without also having custom I beams/king pins to match them.
User avatar
MadMaxetc
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: Kansas, Wichita
Contact:

Post by MadMaxetc »

I think you said it snake.

You would have to have an I-Beam & Spindle set.

I think while I am bored at work I will start modeling up a pair. Who knows, maybe it is my gateway to fame and fortune!!
Dan

Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4 / Work In Progress!
Daily Driver: '67 F-250 Converted to F-100 LWB / 300 / T-5 / 9" 3.70:1 / 235/75R15 Tires
1/4 mile in 17.64s @ 75mph (it's 4200lbs!!!)
"Work Harder! Millions On Welfare Depend On YOU!!"

FORD Girl

Photobucket Pictures
Post Reply