Rear end gears for my 1967 3 speed on the column

Clutch, transmission, rear axle

Moderators: FORDification, 70_F100

Post Reply
67NC
New Member
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 4:58 pm
Location: North Carolina

Rear end gears for my 1967 3 speed on the column

Post by 67NC »

I need help, I am getting about 5 miles to the gallon and it is killing me! I have a straight 6, 300 with a one barrel carb. Only thing I can say is when at 55mph the engine is screaming for another gear. Since I only have 3 and I "assume" the trans should be able to handle these speeds? It can only be the rear end gears are to low. Can anyone suggest what gears to go with? or anything else I should be looking for?

Thanks for any help,
Joel
Elizabeth City, NC
User avatar
jor
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 682
Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2004 9:28 am
Location: Arizona, Tucson

re: Rear end gears for my 1967 3 speed on the column

Post by jor »

Third gear, or high gear, is 1:1 so you're right, the differential ratio is the culprit.I like 3.50 for a good compromise. Maybe a little higher than that even, 3.25 or so. Do you have a tach on your truck? If not, install one and you'll have a better idea of what is happening now.
jor
User avatar
binder56jd
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1067
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:15 pm
Location: Ok ra homa, Ardmore
Contact:

re: Rear end gears for my 1967 3 speed on the column

Post by binder56jd »

3.25 might be a little high for the 3 speed- some thing in the 3.50's would be better imo-jd
"Sell crazy someplace else. We're all stocked up here" — Jack Nicholson, As Good As it Gets

now serving #235

"the only way to believe in the American dream is to be asleep"--GC

How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct. - Benjamin Disraeli
steveheer
New Member
New Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Oregon

re: Rear end gears for my 1967 3 speed on the column

Post by steveheer »

My truck has a 300 with 3.50 gears. It works well. Now I have a 3 speed with the R11 overdrive and my mileage really didn't go up. I will say that I get a minimum of 12ish in town and on the road maybe up to 17. Before the OD I could pull those ##'s too.

I would start by finding out what gears you have now. Jack it up and have a friend help you count driveshaft revolutions. Remember both sides need to turn the same amount to get an accurate driveline count.
Steve
69 F100 300I6
67 Mustang fb FE 431ci
72 Gran Torino Sport 351W
91 Bronco 351
67NC
New Member
New Member
Posts: 11
Joined: Wed Dec 07, 2005 4:58 pm
Location: North Carolina

re: Rear end gears for my 1967 3 speed on the column

Post by 67NC »

Not sure what you mean? Count how many times drive shaft goes around with the wheels? So if I do understand the drive shaft will go around one time per one wheel rotation for a 1 to 1 ratio? and a 3.50 ratio would be 3 turns on drive shaft to 1/2 turn on the wheels?? Sorry I am lost on this. I will go online and do more homework. Please help if you can, thanks.
User avatar
spartman
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1278
Joined: Thu Oct 07, 2004 2:36 pm
Location: South Dakota, Wallace

Post by spartman »

You could crawl under your truck and see if the rear end still has the ID tag on it.

If so post it here and we can tell you what it is.

Or look at this page.

http://www.fordification.com/rearends-ford.htm

Also if you know that it is the original rear you could look at the code on the drivers side door and tell us what is has.
steveheer
New Member
New Member
Posts: 125
Joined: Tue Mar 22, 2005 1:39 pm
Location: Oregon

re: Rear end gears for my 1967 3 speed on the column

Post by steveheer »

You're close. on a 3.5 gear the driveline would turn 3.5 times per 1 turn of the wheels. On a 4.56 gear the wheels would turn 1 turn per 4.56 turns of the driveline. Again, both wheels need to turn exactly the same amount.
Steve
69 F100 300I6
67 Mustang fb FE 431ci
72 Gran Torino Sport 351W
91 Bronco 351
User avatar
CJ,s 67 F100
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 464
Joined: Fri Dec 30, 2005 7:23 pm
Location: Texas

Post by CJ,s 67 F100 »

If you have a tach you can use this formula to find out what it is.
High Gear ratio at 1-1 x mph x 336 Divide by tire height
Example 3.25 x 55 x 336 Div. by 28.5 = rpm,s
3.00 x 55 x 336 div. by 28.5 = 1,945
3.25 x 55 x 336 div. by 28.5 = 2,107
3.50 x 55 x 336 div. by 28.5 = 2,269
4.10 x 55 x 336 div. by 28.5 = 2,658
4.56 x 55 x 336 div. by 28.5 = 2,956
Hope this helps, Charles
User avatar
rjewkes
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3711
Joined: Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:09 am
Location: Missouri, Webb City
Contact:

Post by rjewkes »

My 72 f100 360 c6 3.00 dual exhausts(turbo style raptors) gets 12-13ish in town and 16-17 or 18 highway. As good as the harley7 f150 5.8L.
"It is better to keep your mouth shut and appear stupid than to open it and remove all doubt." - Mark Twain
'70 f250 4x4 Crew cab 460/C6 '72 F100 390/C6 9.8 MPG AVG. '89 Mercury Cougar LS Dual Exh. V6 . 18.9 MPG AVG. In Town.
Image
I don't want to give em a heart-attack. That is what would happen if I answered the door in the buff. Heck it almost scares me to death when I step out of the shower and look in the mirror.~Mancar1~
fuelly.com
User avatar
flyboy2610
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4901
Joined: Sun Oct 03, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: Nebraska, Lincoln

Post by flyboy2610 »

rjewkes wrote:My 72 f100 360 c6 3.00 dual exhausts(turbo style raptors) gets 12-13ish in town and 16-17 or 18 highway. As good as the harley7 f150 5.8L.
Those numbers are about what can be expected from these trucks. They weren't designed for maximum MPG.
"If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you handy."
Red Green

If you're going to live like there's no hell...............
you'd better be right.
http://theworldasiseeit-flyboy2610.blog ... ee-it.html
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Post by fordman »

newer v6 anyone? efi
User avatar
mrung0wa
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 612
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 6:31 am
Location: Soon in Olympia,WA
Contact:

re: Rear end gears for my 1967 3 speed on the column

Post by mrung0wa »

If you got a 9" I go with a 3.55, that's a good compromise.
Check the tag on the Pumpkin that'll tell you!



Lawrence Image
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?pos=-2746

FOR SALE: 64 Galaxie 390HiPo C6 (Project Car)
SOLD! 69 F100 Contractor SPECIAL 300 I6 "Jethro"
01 BMW 325i 4DR E46(Wife's car)
03 EXPEDITION XLT FX4(2WD/AWD/4WD) 5.4L K&N FipK

"I beat my head against the wall, Because it feels good when I stop."
User avatar
binder56jd
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1067
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 9:15 pm
Location: Ok ra homa, Ardmore
Contact:

re: Rear end gears for my 1967 3 speed on the column

Post by binder56jd »

I don't believe that "fuel effienciency" was a major concern during the era these,and remember they were designed to work not haul mama,kids and groceries, "TRUCKS" were manufactured- so if you're getting 12/13 town and 16/17 hwy that's good imo- jd
"Sell crazy someplace else. We're all stocked up here" — Jack Nicholson, As Good As it Gets

now serving #235

"the only way to believe in the American dream is to be asleep"--GC

How much easier it is to be critical than to be correct. - Benjamin Disraeli
Post Reply