73 dana 60 3.53 posi any value drum to drum complete

Clutch, transmission, rear axle

Moderators: FORDification, 70_F100

Post Reply
User avatar
bigdoug22
New Member
New Member
Posts: 28
Joined: Mon Aug 08, 2005 8:15 pm
Location: Washingon, Chimacum

73 dana 60 3.53 posi any value drum to drum complete

Post by bigdoug22 »

just ran into one today gotta look at everthing, this new truck is becoming an illness. Just pulled a set of matching red seats colorwise all leather dual electric seats from a 83 Lincoln Mark V!!. HELP :cry:
72 f250 camper special and it only cost 200.00 and it has now soared over the $1000 mark
User avatar
FORDification
Site & Forum Admin
Site & Forum Admin
Posts: 8049
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Kansas, Wellsville
Contact:

re: 73 dana 60 3.53 posi any value drum to drum complete

Post by FORDification »

Well, the rearend assembly as a whole won't work for the '67-'72 trucks, due to it being wider....unless you relocate the spring perches. However, by doing so and using this assembly will allow your rear tires to track behind the fronts, something they're not doing now. Otherwise, AFAIK the carrier should be swappable into the earlier Dana 60s. Either way, it's definitely worth saving.
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
ImageImageImage
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
User avatar
Redcap
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 947
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 10:29 pm
Location: Washington, Centralia
Contact:

re: 73 dana 60 3.53 posi any value drum to drum complete

Post by Redcap »

I'd hang onto it just for the 3.54 gears and the LSD.
User avatar
willowbilly3
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1591
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Black Hills

re: 73 dana 60 3.53 posi any value drum to drum complete

Post by willowbilly3 »

Keith, were the F-250s narower too? I assume a 73 Dana 60 to be a 3/4 ton. I know th pads would be closer together (unless it came from a highboy) but what about overall width?
Great ideas have always encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.
User avatar
FORDification
Site & Forum Admin
Site & Forum Admin
Posts: 8049
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Kansas, Wellsville
Contact:

re: 73 dana 60 3.53 posi any value drum to drum complete

Post by FORDification »

Hmmm....AFAIK all '67-'72 F100/F250 rearend assemblies are narrower in width, whereas all '73-'79 rearend assemblies are wider in total width and also have the spring perches farther apart due to the wider rear frame. However, the '73 thru '77-1/2 Highboy rearend assemblies, even though they're still wider overall, have the same framerail spacing as ours so those would have the perches in the right spot, making it a bolt-in for our trucks.
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
ImageImageImage
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
Post Reply