Why do we install carbureted engines in our Fords?

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

Post Reply
User avatar
kaptnkaos
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2029
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:27 am
Location: Washington, Elma

re: Why do we install carbureted engines in our Fords?

Post by kaptnkaos »

Hey RobRoy...

FE's came with carbs...
While they may not be as fuel efficient as computerized engines they're simple and easy to work on.
Many of the guys here have put EFI engines in their trucks, several others have put desiels in as well.
Just about anything goes...
Well except for putting a POC chevy engine in a bump, that'll get ya flogged around here... :D

KaptnKA 8) S
Washington...The land where rust is like the family pet...Ya learn to live with it and clean up after its mess... KaptnKAOS

"Olde Skool" '68 Ford Bluebird short bus
"FRODO" '68 F-250 Camper Special project
Texas69
New Member
New Member
Posts: 41
Joined: Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:53 am
Location: Austin

re: Why do we install carbureted engines in our Fords?

Post by Texas69 »

I think some of it has to lack of knowledge about FI me especiallyand FE's didn't come with fuel injection.Just my ':2cents:'
1969 F100 Ranger shortbed 360 3 on tree.
User avatar
kaptnkaos
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2029
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 1:27 am
Location: Washington, Elma

re: Why do we install carbureted engines in our Fords?

Post by kaptnkaos »

:yt:

I have been trying to replace a simple fuel filter in my '95 Caravan with EFI 3.3 liter.
I have the manuel and know what to do...
Now, I have to find a pressure relief tool # C-4779-1 that is included with fuel gauge # C-4799-A...
:dk: wwwwuuuuzzzzuuuuppppwwwwiiitttdddaaaatt :dk:
The book don't show no pics of it.. so I don't even know what the heck to look for... no one even knows what the heck a C-4779-1 is...
If I wuz changing fuel filters on my '68 CS I wud have been done yesterday in 10 minutes... if that long...
AAAARRRRGGGG !!! I hate these things

Nuff said...

KaptnKA 8) S
Washington...The land where rust is like the family pet...Ya learn to live with it and clean up after its mess... KaptnKAOS

"Olde Skool" '68 Ford Bluebird short bus
"FRODO" '68 F-250 Camper Special project
User avatar
rubiranch
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 321
Joined: Sat Feb 24, 2007 12:26 am
Location: Utah

re: Why do we install carbureted engines in our Fords?

Post by rubiranch »

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

:2cents:

:fr:
72 F-250 CS XLT 390 C-6 4.10 40k miles
You don't shoot to kill, you shoot to stay alive.
I don't carry because I have to, I carry because I get to.
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?album=514
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

re: Why do we install carbureted engines in our Fords?

Post by Dragon »

I am carburetored but am looking at TBI by Xmas for better mileage and good power. :2cents:
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4893
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

re: Why do we install carbureted engines in our Fords?

Post by DuckRyder »

It is all about the money... :wink:
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Post by robroy »

Hey Folks,

So if money is a big factor, are FI engines really that much more expensive (considering that performance FEs can be over $10k)?

Thanks for the great replies!
-Robroy
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4893
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

re: Why do we install carbureted engines in our Fords?

Post by DuckRyder »

I think it has more to do with return on investment and value, coupled with use of the vehicle.

My truck is not a daily driver nor my only vehicle. It is sort of a plaything. Even with a 450.00 carburetor it fires right up and by the time I get to the end of the neighborhood it is running like it is warmed up. It should be making over 400hp.

Would it probably run a little better, make a little more horsepower, and get a little better fuel mileage with EFI? YES. Is it worth an extra $1000-$3000 to me for it to do that? NO.

Thinking of it another way, if you are building a hot rod carb motor that cost $10,000.00 it is probably a $12,000.00 motor with EFI, so that is a 20% premium for probably about a 5% performance improvement.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Post by averagef250 »

From the high performance aspect there is little advantage to EFI over a carb. a 300 HP engine is still a 300 HP carb or EFI.

The real advantage is the simple fact that 90% of those out there with an old carbed vehicle that like to fiddle with their motor and bolt on shiny parts and claim to have 400 HP really have about 200 on a good day. The reality is that a 250 HP EFI V8 will run smooth as glass and stomp the p*ss out of so-and-so's 200HP 400 HP chromed out and loud carbed V8.

That and So-and-so spent $5000+ on his 200HP 400HP V8 and, though sounding good, actually runs like a$$. Someone like me spends $500 on an EFI 351W, some 24lb/hr injectors and a used cam off craigslist and packs his lunch from stoplight to stoplight. I can also fire my EFI rig up when it's 10 below outside and it starts instantly, runs smooth and warms up quickly. It always runs exactly the same, no matter how hard I run it and has excellent low end torque and street manners.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
DuckRyder
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 4893
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
Location: Scruffy City
Contact:

Re: Why do we install carbureted engines in our Fords?

Post by DuckRyder »

robroy wrote:Do these modern, carbureted FEs have any technical advantage over computer controlled fuel injected engines?
Back to the original subject, no modern carbureted FEs do not have any technical advantage.

Remember as well that putting EFI on a motor which was never available from the factory is a whole different scenario than swapping in a modern EFI motor, or EFI onto a motor that had it later in life from the factory.

Don't get me wrong, I like EFI. I tell the BMW and VW folks there is absolutely no way I would remove functional or repairable EFI in favor of a carb.
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)

"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Post by robroy »

Thanks for the informative comments guys!
User avatar
19674x4
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:31 am
Location: Oakland Oregon/Sheridan Wyoming

Post by 19674x4 »

another objective is dealing with altitude changes. although tuning a carb for altitude is simple as adjusting air/fuel mixtures, it still involves pulling over, taking cleaner off and doing it, where as fuel injection, you dont even have to worry about it
My Photo Album
2012 Cummins-the luxury Tow Pig
1967 F-250 highboy 352, np435(((((((sold))))))))) My first true love
1968 F100 SWB. 360, np-435, flatbed, currently acting as a hornest nest and bee hive.
1971 F-100 4x4 Step-side. 360, np-435, 70k origional miles- needs allot of love.
User avatar
robroy
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 3768
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2008 4:36 pm
Location: California, Salinas

Post by robroy »

Hi 19674x4, that's interesting. As altitude increases we're supposed to tune leaner, correct? Because of lower air density?

Thanks!
-Robroy
User avatar
Dragon
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2659
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Albuquerque, New Mexico
Contact:

Post by Dragon »

19674x4 wrote:another objective is dealing with altitude changes. although tuning a carb for altitude is simple as adjusting air/fuel mixtures, it still involves pulling over, taking cleaner off and doing it, where as fuel injection, you dont even have to worry about it
In the old days going to the top of Mt. Evans (14,000) required a lot of rough running even if you were jetted for 5000 ft. Black smoke and all. My 98 taurus SE 3.0 went to the top with out a glitch.

Yes robroy 1 jet size smaller on a Holley or Autolite for every 2000 feet above sea level. My 80508s 750 Holley went from 70s on the primary to 68s and runs great at 5000ft. I was down to 8mpg with 70s and black plugs.
Old Fords Rule
Was a Ford Service Tech
71 F250 with Shell Car 390 NP435 Dana 60 3.73s, PS, PB, 750 EC VS Holley Accel Points Eliminator.
98 Volvo S70 2.4T Auto
71 Service manuals Volumes 1,2,3 and 4 So ask away. :)
My Gallery
Spark test
User avatar
j41385
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:07 am
Location: Albany, Oregon Territory

Post by j41385 »

robroy wrote:I see, thanks folks!

I think for younger guys like myself fuel injection isn't as mysterious because we learned about it at the same time or even before learning about carbs. Sure it's more complex, but it's also easier in that the computer tells us what it thinks is wrong when it's not running right.

-Robroy
Well I am a young guy (23), and I dont want Electronics, or computers running things in my truck, if I did, I would buy a newer one. Simplicity is the key to reliability.
1968 F100 Took the running 390 out, and installed a Built 300 with AOD.
Engine Video... http://youtube.com/watch?v=2xgYd2u79NU


Image

Image Image
Post Reply