302 swap

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

Post Reply
mattr67
New Member
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Roy Wa

302 swap

Post by mattr67 »

i did some searching but didnt find what i need. so i have a 67 with a 240 I6 just wondering will a 302 bolt into the 240s motor mounts and what else i will need for this swap
User avatar
td
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2007 8:44 pm
Location: Tennessee, Lexington

re: 302 swap

Post by td »

I know for sure the I-6 frame mounts won't work. you'll need to find some v-8 frame mounts. are you swaping trannies as well?
mattr67
New Member
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Roy Wa

re: 302 swap

Post by mattr67 »

yes i will be swaping trannys too. mine is toast
User avatar
FORDification
Site & Forum Admin
Site & Forum Admin
Posts: 8049
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Kansas, Wellsville
Contact:

re: 302 swap

Post by FORDification »

http://www.fordification.com/enginestands.htm

It'll physically work, but using FE/I6 stands for a 302 will cause the engine to sit app. 1" too high, altering the driveshaft angle. The best scenario would be to find the proper small-block stands.

However, you could also just shim up the transmission crossmember a similar amount to match the engine stands. Not the ideal solution, but not totally 'ghetto'. ;)
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
ImageImageImage
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
User avatar
AK F100
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: Eagle River, AK

Post by AK F100 »

Wow, good info. Going from memory only, I think my truck has I6 stands and the truck had a 289/302 in it when I bought it.
GPBFD Pyro Maniac
Daily Driver: 1974 F100 4x4 (ride'n on 8-Luggers) Build in progress
1997 F-350 Crew Cab 4x4, 7.3L Diesel SOLD
Pile-O-Parts: 1968 F100 - 2WD Shorty SOLD
Looking for a new project 57-60 Ford Truck
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Post by averagef250 »

You could also swap a 300 in place of the 240 and have more truck power than a 302 could ever dream of.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
mattr67
New Member
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Roy Wa

re: 302 swap

Post by mattr67 »

so what do you guys think would be the best v8 for a swb bump. i want power but i dont want to spend alot for it
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

Post by sideoilerfe »

averagef250 wrote:You could also swap a 300 in place of the 240 and have more truck power than a 302 could ever dream of.


:yt:
A 300 is an excellent motor. Visit www.fordsix.com for performance advice.

To be honest, a 300 is best for low end torque. They'll not only pull anything but they'll outlast any V8. They're not high revin' horsepower engines but you can build them to be quite impressive.

:2cents:
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
User avatar
j41385
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 288
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 7:07 am
Location: Albany, Oregon Territory

re: 302 swap

Post by j41385 »

Add another vote for the 300, and see my signature.
1968 F100 Took the running 390 out, and installed a Built 300 with AOD.
Engine Video... http://youtube.com/watch?v=2xgYd2u79NU


Image

Image Image
mattr67
New Member
New Member
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Mar 10, 2008 9:52 pm
Location: Roy Wa

re: 302 swap

Post by mattr67 »

i found a complete 1981 302 with around 100,000 miles for $150 supposed to run good. but i heard that the 80's engines are smoged down an have less power than 70's engines is this true
User avatar
GT-Racer
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 417
Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 6:33 pm
Location: West Virginia, Parkersburg

Post by GT-Racer »

if going witha small block why not get a 351w? it is essentially the same swap as 302 and you get a bunch more torque. I have a mild 72 351w making 400 hp. Just a cam, headers, aluminum intake and 4bbl.
80's are definitely down on power from older models.
I may have a set of small block perches if needed. pm me.
'67 F100 2wd shortbed - Beginning restoration.
351w, 5-speed, 3:70 gears (someday)

Drivin' a Chevy is Kinda Like wipin' before you poop, it just don't make no sense....:)
nevrenufhp
New Member
New Member
Posts: 134
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 8:51 pm
Location: California, Modesto
Contact:

Post by nevrenufhp »

GT-Racer wrote:if going witha small block why not get a 351w? it is essentially the same swap as 302 and you get a bunch more torque. I have a mild 72 351w making 400 hp. Just a cam, headers, aluminum intake and 4bbl.
80's are definitely down on power from older models.
I may have a set of small block perches if needed. pm me.
I'd agree with going with the 351W if keeping it small. This 400hp, I'd really like to see with just a cam, hedders, and 4V intake. I built a 351C- 4V(closed chamber 4V heads) that had about $3200 worth of parts in it, and it was 330hp at the wheels. I just dont see 400hp happening with W heads, unless they're aftermarket & high flow....I'm not trying to be pi$$y about it though.
67 F100, 300(Offy intake, Edelbrock 500, 274*/.518" lift cam, heddder, duraspark & Summit CD ign), 4spd, power steering swap, front disc and hydroboost.
08 VW R32
increase diesel fuel rate site:
http://www.freewebs.com/nevrenufhp/index.htm
User avatar
basketcase0302
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 6805
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 7:11 am
Location: Hawthorne, Florida

re: 302 swap

Post by basketcase0302 »

mattr67,
You could also swap a 300 in place of the 240 and have more truck power than a 302 could ever dream of.
I don't think any of Ford's I-6's can touch this 302:
http://www.worldcastings.com/prods_page ... r_alum.htm

Hopefully I'll own one of these before I die...
Build it to a 347 stroker and you got one bad-to-the-bone small block. :thup:

Basketcase
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Post by averagef250 »

Actually, I'm pretty sure a bone stock 1V 300 would walk all over that 302 with a 5000 pound trailer in tow.

For a TRUCK you need a TRUCK engine. A 302 may be a great engine, but I can gaurantee the engineers who made it with it's dinky little 3" stroke and light rotating mass had no intention of putting it in a fullsize truck.

And to the mild 351W making 400HP is that with a 200 shot of nitrous? I have respect for the 351W, it does fairly well for it's size. I've done a lot of wheeling with a brute low end torque one in an early bronco, but even being able to pick the front tires off the ground with a hard 3-2 downshift at 25 MPH I seriously doubt it's making more than 200HP and 300TQ.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
basketcase0302
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 6805
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 7:11 am
Location: Hawthorne, Florida

re: 302 swap

Post by basketcase0302 »

Forgot how to spell relentless...

There are literally thousands of these documented, want a couple more?

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=3zhYTFWAI ... re=related :lolprev:

Basketcase
Jeff
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=46251
SOLD-71 F-350 dually flatbed, 302 / .030 over V-8 with a "baby"C-6, B & M truckshifter, Dana70/4.11 ratio, intermittent wipers, tilt steering, full LED lighting on the flat bed, and no stereo yet (this way I can hear the rattles to diagnose)! SOLD!
Many Ford bumps / one 76' EB / and several dents through the years.
A lot of "oddball" Ford parts collected from working on them for 34 years now!
2008 Ford Escape 4 x 4
Post Reply