The stance??

Suspension, steering, brakes, wheels & tires

Moderator: FORDification

User avatar
sport71
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:17 pm
Location: Texas, Mission

Re: The stance??

Post by sport71 »

67MercM100 wrote:Obviously...she's sittin' too low in the back relative to the front.
I'm a computer programmer. Beyond the 'computer' stuff, my forte is breaking things down.

So the next question is: Do I raise the rear or lower the front?
I'm a "fresh newbie". But I've already figured out that lowering one of "our trucks" with the twin I-beam suspension is a bit more involved that on other (lesser :) ) vehicles.

Now, let me ask - what is the 'purpose' of your truck? Radical custom? Occasional (cool implied) cruiser? Daily driver? Pickup (ie: workhorse)? Mixed parts of some or all of those?

If you're a "custom" or "cruiser" and maybe have the occasional 'light hauling'...AND you think the dough for the dropm I-beams is worth it...then drop the front.
Here's some "geek" for you to consider. (actually...it could be COBOL code)
IF (CUSTOM = 'Y' OR CRUISER = 'Y' OR DAILY-DRIVER = 'Y') AND HAULING NOT > 'LIGHT'
IF DROP-BEAMS = 'WORTH-IT"
PERFORM DROP-THE FRONT
ELSE
PERFORM RAISE-THE REAR
END-IF
ELSE
PERFORM RAISE-THE REAR.

Hopefully someone gets at least a chuckle out of my analysis. :D

PS: Nice truck. what size wheels and tires are on it? i need ideas!
It will be a show truck. "HOPEFULY" this year.
The reasen I like the stance is because it looks as if it is going real fast just sitting there..
That's just me..
I liked your analysis, you must have graduated high school..LOL...
As for wheels they are 15's... 8's in the front and 10's in the back that size works for me the 295-50-15's are pretty wide and look like small slicks.
Those who do not learn the lessons of history, are doomed to repeat it.
User avatar
papabug71
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 2002
Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 11:31 pm
Location: McAlester, Oklahoma

Re: The stance??

Post by papabug71 »

I like your truck. I agree with fordman, the body looks mint just the way it is.

As far as the stance goes, its bulldoggin' just a little bit. I would bring the front down to match the rear. It will look good!!
Image
Matt
1971 F-100 Sport Custom - My grandpaws truck
Been in the family since 10/3/'71 (Brand spankin' new)
Mine since 5/7/'94
302 / 3 speed / 3:25's
--Currently undergoing full frame off resto/mod--
User avatar
Joshpow
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1790
Joined: Fri Jan 21, 2005 10:43 am
Location: Virginia
Contact:

Re: The stance??

Post by Joshpow »

Drop the front a tiny bit and big tires in back is my :2cents: . It looks great as is though.
Josh

72 F-100 Ranger XLT SWB
71 F-100 Custom SWB
67 F-350 Dually Dump
02 F-250 Stroke
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2972100
User avatar
mike68merc
New Member
New Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:05 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The stance??

Post by mike68merc »

if it's too low...you're too old :lol: {/quote}

Praise the Lowered :D[/quote]

..........I"d recommend following the "Holy" words of these (other) WISE MEN! :bow: :bow:


It's a wild coincidence, but here's your trucks long lost TWIN brother!!

Image

The Mustang II IFS (set up correctly) handles like a slot car, rides excellent & DOES NOT reduce the load carrying capacity of a half ton truck!
It costs a bit, but not many are as enjoyable to drive....& the LOOKS don't SUCK either. :wink:

Image

Your ride looks great now, but my personal opinion is that THIS LOOK is pretty tough to beat! :thup:

The one below is mine...(So you know that I'm following my own advice).

Image


So in case you missed it, I recommend Slammin' the Heck out of it!

It's just MY PERSONAL (excellent) opinion....But this is the "Land Of The Free",
& "there's an A## for every seat!",
& "TO EACH HIS OWN!"
.......That even applies to those OLD dumb guys with bad taste! :P

Just Kiddin!! :evil: (Kind of)
User avatar
sport71
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:17 pm
Location: Texas, Mission

Re: The stance??

Post by sport71 »

mike68merc wrote:if it's too low...you're too old :lol: {/quote}

Praise the Lowered :D
..........I"d recommend following the "Holy" words of these (other) WISE MEN! :bow: :bow:


It's a wild coincidence, but here's your trucks long lost TWIN brother!!

Image

The Mustang II IFS (set up correctly) handles like a slot car, rides excellent & DOES NOT reduce the load carrying capacity of a half ton truck!
It costs a bit, but not many are as enjoyable to drive....& the LOOKS don't SUCK either. :wink:

Image

Your ride looks great now, but my personal opinion is that THIS LOOK is pretty tough to beat! :thup:

The one below is mine...(So you know that I'm following my own advice).

Image


So in case you missed it, I recommend Slammin' the Heck out of it!

It's just MY PERSONAL (excellent) opinion....But this is the "Land Of The Free",
& "there's an A## for every seat!",
& "TO EACH HIS OWN!"
.......That even applies to those OLD dumb guys with bad taste! :P

Just Kiddin!! :evil: (Kind of)[/quote]

I love that you have stance, the only thing is I've spent a little over $7,000 and my wife is jelous...So I have to work with the rear drop for now, it won't be extra to flip the front shakles. Maybe in a couple of years I'll drop the front.
I keep forgetting my camara for updates on my project. For sure next week...
I've seen your trucks progress, and I'm jelous. Congratulations. :thup:
Those who do not learn the lessons of history, are doomed to repeat it.
User avatar
mike68merc
New Member
New Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:05 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The stance??

Post by mike68merc »

I CERTAINLY understand financial limitations & keeping your PRIORITIES in line! ...My project is on a temporary "financial hiatus" for similar reasons. :thup:
My truck was (originally) supposed to be DRIVABLE project, & I was happily heading down the same road you are....But somewhere along the line,
I lost ALL self-control & kinda "threw in all my chips" (so to speak) :woohoo: .

You've got a cool project truck, that you'll be able to DRIVE & enjoy while mine is still "financially HIGH CENTERED" in the garage!! :doh:

Image

So if you're gonna do that whole "sensible thing"....I'd recommend checking out T.D.'s '68. :drive:
(He's posted earlier in this forum) His build went down the same road, with great results!

Thanks for the kind words & ENJOY THE RIDE....I'd love to see more pics. :D

P.S. I agree....I kinda like the WIDE side trim (on your year truck). But isn't that used ONLY in conjunction with the "thin" rocker mouldings?....I like those also,
but it's a LOTTA trim to buy & I also wonder if the mounting holes are the same? They're easily welded up & RE-drilled, but just thought I'd bring it up.
Last edited by mike68merc on Fri Jan 30, 2009 9:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
wt4speed#2
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1064
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2005 9:21 pm
Location: Texas, Ft. Worth

Re: The stance??

Post by wt4speed#2 »

td wrote:1 round out of the coils would set her down in the front real sweet, but then you may want to find someone to bend your i-beams a little to correct the small amount of neg. camber you'd have :thup:

By the way, super sharp truck!!! :drool:
My guy in Ft worth will bend em for a 'C' note or less. I've know him for years and he is the only one I've ever know that could align any Ford and make it drive right.I used to manage the shop he still works in, people come from all over to get there trucks done.
Tony B.Image
DFW Area
Image
"Someday...
I hope you to get the chance,
to live like you are dying"
Member#'s 236 & 403
Úlf the Comedy Sidekick
'69 F-100 "Stepper"(currently in a bigillion pieces )
wt's ride
thebucket
User avatar
AK F100
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: Eagle River, AK

Re: The stance??

Post by AK F100 »

sport71 - you have a great lookin truck. As said before. Keep the narrow trim (or give it to me :D ) and lower the front a bit. :thup:

mike68merc - That's one heck of a rollin chassis you got there, looks real nice. :thup:
GPBFD Pyro Maniac
Daily Driver: 1974 F100 4x4 (ride'n on 8-Luggers) Build in progress
1997 F-350 Crew Cab 4x4, 7.3L Diesel SOLD
Pile-O-Parts: 1968 F100 - 2WD Shorty SOLD
Looking for a new project 57-60 Ford Truck
User avatar
mike68merc
New Member
New Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:05 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The stance??

Post by mike68merc »

AK F100 - Thank you very much. :drive: She'll be on the road....someday!

sport71 - How bad is the damage to your truck? & How far along are you on repairs?

Image

Not to :bdh: , but here's a super clean truck with the wide trim, & a killer stance. Something like this, WAS what I was envisioning, :love: when I first began shopping for a 67-72 project truck.

The 68 MERC I've ended up with will be a little different, but I guess I dig the Resto/Rod look, with all the stock (some might even say "GAUDY") trim. :doh:

Image

You said you liked the Pale Yellow? :yt:

I think this ones wheel size & style are a bit off, as is the stance...BUT, get it sitting like the brown one above (or even lower!) :drool:
User avatar
19674x4
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 903
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 12:31 am
Location: Oakland Oregon/Sheridan Wyoming

Re: The stance??

Post by 19674x4 »

mrtleavitt wrote:Please don't lower it any more! Raise the back end an inch or two so it sits level. Lowering trucks is way over rated! :thup:
:woohoo: :yip: :yes: :yt:
My Photo Album
2012 Cummins-the luxury Tow Pig
1967 F-250 highboy 352, np435(((((((sold))))))))) My first true love
1968 F100 SWB. 360, np-435, flatbed, currently acting as a hornest nest and bee hive.
1971 F-100 4x4 Step-side. 360, np-435, 70k origional miles- needs allot of love.
User avatar
mike68merc
New Member
New Member
Posts: 114
Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2007 7:05 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The stance??

Post by mike68merc »

:yt:
User avatar
AK F100
Preferred User
Preferred User
Posts: 337
Joined: Fri Mar 30, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: Eagle River, AK

Re: The stance??

Post by AK F100 »

That's funny right there, I don't care who ya are........ :lol: :lol:
GPBFD Pyro Maniac
Daily Driver: 1974 F100 4x4 (ride'n on 8-Luggers) Build in progress
1997 F-350 Crew Cab 4x4, 7.3L Diesel SOLD
Pile-O-Parts: 1968 F100 - 2WD Shorty SOLD
Looking for a new project 57-60 Ford Truck
70shortwide

Re: The stance??

Post by 70shortwide »

Took the words right outa my mouth. in good humor i hope. lol
User avatar
willowbilly3
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1591
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 7:38 pm
Location: Black Hills

Re: The stance??

Post by willowbilly3 »

mike68merc wrote:AK F100 - Thank you very much. :drive: She'll be on the road....someday!

sport71 - How bad is the damage to your truck? & How far along are you on repairs?

Image

Not to :bdh: , but here's a super clean truck with the wide trim, & a killer stance. Something like this, WAS what I was envisioning, :love: when I first began shopping for a 67-72 project truck.

The 68 MERC I've ended up with will be a little different, but I guess I dig the Resto/Rod look, with all the stock (some might even say "GAUDY") trim. :doh:

Image

You said you liked the Pale Yellow? :yt:

I think this ones wheel size & style are a bit off, as is the stance...BUT, get it sitting like the brown one above (or even lower!) :drool:
I am not a fan of the pudgy trim but this truck sets just right and has the right amount of sidewall I like to see on old trucks, any lower and you need to consider some off the top to keep it in balance. Sorry young people, the big 20-22-24s disappearing into the fender don't look right to me and neither does the frame dragging stance. If you look at the true customs it was always a balance of several body mods that made the best looking cars, not just an extreme drop with the latest fad bling wheels.
And yes I might haul something in my truck, that's what it's for, that's why my roadster is a roadster pickup. If I want to go fast and handle like a sports car then that's what I will drive.
Great ideas have always encounter violent opposition from mediocre minds.
User avatar
sport71
Blue Oval Fan
Blue Oval Fan
Posts: 560
Joined: Sun Oct 02, 2005 6:17 pm
Location: Texas, Mission

Re: The stance??

Post by sport71 »

Billy - It was just the front end I got it all already, and it's at the paint shop now. I'll be posting soon next week to keep you all up to date.

Mike - I bought the bottom ranger trim on ebay a long time ago to go with the wide Ranger trim but i don't know. I kinda want to see it wide, with wide trim that goes all the way to the back. I know it will look good no matter what.
Mine will be like the yellow and white. only with the white top and 1969 chrome grill (only $350 to get it triple chromed) as for the wheels, they have to be 15's. like the brown maroon truck..
Now I have 2 projects, last week i went to Oklhoma and bought my son Ruboner a 1971 custom long bed, great body for $750. http://www.fordtrucksandparts.com/catalog5.html
We will be changing into a Sport custom short bed. (I like the idea that ford made the Sport custom for 3 years only.) He is 14 now and by the time he is 16 I think it might be ready.

What do you think of the stance on this truck, and if you don't like it you can bite it.. :lol:
Image
Not bad ehh... :D
Last edited by sport71 on Wed May 13, 2009 9:57 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Those who do not learn the lessons of history, are doomed to repeat it.
Post Reply