New engine necessary if cylinder output low (#5 and #8)

Engine, ignition, fuel, cooling, exhaust

Moderators: Ranchero50, DuckRyder

Post Reply
ckazF100
New Member
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: Wed Apr 04, 2018 12:38 pm

New engine necessary if cylinder output low (#5 and #8)

Post by ckazF100 »

Just wondering if jumping the gun on going from "could just be a bad spark plug, to low output on 2 cylinders, to needing a new engine"?

That is the discussion I had with my mechanic. Says must be worn out from unleaded gas use (still the original engine in 1968 Ford F100 390).

I know not a lot of detail, if this is common and jumping right to needing a new engine... Suggestions for another path prior to another engine (now were talking labor).

Thanks in advance!!

CK
User avatar
Ranchero50
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5799
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Maryland, Hagerstown
Contact:

Re: New engine necessary if cylinder output low (#5 and #8)

Post by Ranchero50 »

For a WAG I'd be more apt to think the old rubber valve seals turned brittle, failed and clogged the back drain ports which allowed oil to build up and leak down the valve guides to the point it's causing issues.

Define how you determined low output. RPM drop comparison while shorting the plugs?
'70 F-350 CS Cummins 6BT 10klb truck 64k mile Bahama Blue

Contact me for CNC Dome Lamp Bezels and Ash Tray pulls.
Busboy
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 943
Joined: Sat Jan 24, 2015 9:51 am
Location: Nampa Idaho

Re: New engine necessary if cylinder output low (#5 and #8)

Post by Busboy »

Find a mechanic that doesn't jump to conclusions. Run a compression test. Don't guess.
1967 F-100 4x4 custom cab.
Another 67 F-100 4x4 custom cab.
2016 F-150 Eco-Boost 2.7 liter. (It will smoke the tires!)
1972 F-350 Sport Custom cab & chassis.
1972 F-250 Explorer Special, Camper Special.
1971 F-100 custom. 302, C-4, p.s. p.b. factory 65 amp alternator with transistorized voltage regulator.
User avatar
colnago
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1882
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:48 pm
Location: Ridgecrest, CA

Re: New engine necessary if cylinder output low (#5 and #8)

Post by colnago »

I Had an engine with low compression on two cylinders (~70 on one cylinder, ~35 on another). It ran fine for 5+ years until I dropped in a rebuilt engine. You don't need to rush to any big conclusion. Especially if you're looking at rebuilding, what are you going to hurt if you keep running it?

Joseph
"Sugar", my 1967 Ford F250 2WD Camper Special, 352FE, Ford iron "T" Intake with 1405 Edelbrock, Duraspark II Ignition, C6 transmission, front disc brake conversion.
Redcrew71
New Member
New Member
Posts: 44
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 10:08 am

Re: New engine necessary if cylinder output low (#5 and #8)

Post by Redcrew71 »

Ranchero50 wrote:For a WAG I'd be more apt to think the old rubber valve seals turned brittle, failed and clogged the back drain ports which allowed oil to build up and leak down the valve guides to the point it's causing issues.

Define how you determined low output. RPM drop comparison while shorting the plugs?
would no valve seals also cause smoke? Found my 71 f250 w/360 to be a mosquito fogger when I got it. found out a few valve rods were bent and the one side was plugged for oil drain up top. Cleaned all that up now no smoke. But overall not a ton of power but again all original 47 yr old engine.
never bothered with cylinder pressure check...its a run about to the dump and lumber store.
tnlprt
Blue Oval Guru
Blue Oval Guru
Posts: 1144
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 5:18 pm
Location: St Louis mo

Re: New engine necessary if cylinder output low (#5 and #8)

Post by tnlprt »

Do a leak down test
User avatar
colnago
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 1882
Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 8:48 pm
Location: Ridgecrest, CA

Re: New engine necessary if cylinder output low (#5 and #8)

Post by colnago »

tnlprt wrote:Do a leak down test
On re-reading the original post, I concur. With what you posted, you might "just" need to rebuild the heads. Yes, this is can be an endeavor, but not as daunting as a complete engine rebuild. The leak-down test should (hopefully) show whether it's rings or valves.

Joseph
"Sugar", my 1967 Ford F250 2WD Camper Special, 352FE, Ford iron "T" Intake with 1405 Edelbrock, Duraspark II Ignition, C6 transmission, front disc brake conversion.
User avatar
Ranchero50
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 5799
Joined: Wed Nov 08, 2006 7:02 pm
Location: Maryland, Hagerstown
Contact:

Re: New engine necessary if cylinder output low (#5 and #8)

Post by Ranchero50 »

Redcrew71 wrote:
Ranchero50 wrote:For a WAG I'd be more apt to think the old rubber valve seals turned brittle, failed and clogged the back drain ports which allowed oil to build up and leak down the valve guides to the point it's causing issues.

Define how you determined low output. RPM drop comparison while shorting the plugs?
would no valve seals also cause smoke? Found my 71 f250 w/360 to be a mosquito fogger when I got it. found out a few valve rods were bent and the one side was plugged for oil drain up top. Cleaned all that up now no smoke. But overall not a ton of power but again all original 47 yr old engine.
never bothered with cylinder pressure check...its a run about to the dump and lumber store.
When the oil drain is clogged, especially the rear one oil will build up in the cover until it floods the valves and gets sucked into the intake path.
'70 F-350 CS Cummins 6BT 10klb truck 64k mile Bahama Blue

Contact me for CNC Dome Lamp Bezels and Ash Tray pulls.
Post Reply