1982 5.0L 302 and 1972 three speed tranny flywheel trouble

Clutch, transmission, rear axle

Moderators: FORDification, 70_F100

Post Reply
mitchmc_13
New Member
New Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:28 pm

1982 5.0L 302 and 1972 three speed tranny flywheel trouble

Post by mitchmc_13 »

I blew the engine on my 72 ford truck recently. It came with a three speed manual tranny, and a 5.0 L engine. I have decided to go with a newer engine as i could not find an older one that was in good enough shape to be worth rebuilding. So i went and picked up a 5.0 L 302 out of a 1982 mercury capri at the local autowrecker. It apparently ran good and had good compression across all cylinders before they took it out of the car. This engine matched up with the original tranny in the truck perfectly, but the flywheel on the newer engine is only 11 inches and the old one was much bigger, so that poses the problem of the starter matching up with the flywheel to make it turn, which it doesnt. So i am wondering if the bell housing off of a mustang or capri from 1982 would match up with the tranny that i have...because if it did, i could use the bell housing and starter off of an 82 mustang and everything would match up. I am really hoping to keep the original tranny with this project. Any feedback would be appreciated!!
User avatar
customcrewcab
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:43 pm
Location: Queen Creek Arizona
Contact:

re: 1982 5.0L 302 and 1972 three speed tranny flywheel troub

Post by customcrewcab »

well i think the balance on 82 motor is 50oz and 72 302 is 28oz. so you can't just swap flywheels and i don't think you can use the bellhousing. i would just use what you got and get a smaller clutch or look for a bigger flywheel thats 28oz. : just make sure its the right balance or it is shake bad and prob blow up very quickly.
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10106
Image
if theres a new way, i'll be the first in line. it better work this time

1970 crewcab 393w afr heads, 6 speed, turbocharged, 6 piston calipers 13" rotors on all 4 corners
User avatar
customcrewcab
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 830
Joined: Wed Feb 02, 2005 6:43 pm
Location: Queen Creek Arizona
Contact:

re: 1982 5.0L 302 and 1972 three speed tranny flywheel troub

Post by customcrewcab »

i would pm averagef250. he knows alot about transmissions
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?cat=10106
Image
if theres a new way, i'll be the first in line. it better work this time

1970 crewcab 393w afr heads, 6 speed, turbocharged, 6 piston calipers 13" rotors on all 4 corners
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Post by averagef250 »

That's a good idea! Crappy thing is he doesn't know either.

If I was in your shoes I'd check into aftermarket flywheels if it really came down to it. Either that or you might be able to get a machine shop to rebalance your old flywheel to be correct for the newer engine. 22oz is a ton of metal though.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
FORDification
Site & Forum Admin
Site & Forum Admin
Posts: 8050
Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
Location: Kansas, Wellsville
Contact:

re: 1982 5.0L 302 and 1972 three speed tranny flywheel troub

Post by FORDification »

Some tidbits of info I've saved from other online sources...cannot verify their validity or accuracy:
FordMuscle mag wrote:If your car was an automatic you will need to get a flywheel which matches the balance factor of your motor. All 289's use a 28 oz. balance factor. Early 302's up to late 1970's also used a 28 oz. factor, but after that point Ford switched to a 50 oz. balance factor. If you mix and match the flywheels (or harmonic balancers) your engine will vibrate itself to death! So be sure you only install the flywheel with the correct balance factor. A good machine shop can convert the more common late-model 50oz. flywheel to a 28oz. balance factor for around $50. The 50oz. flywheels are also drilled for the larger 10.5" diaphagm clutch, which the 28oz. Flywheels must use the early style 10" three-finger clutches.
The difference in flywheel diameter isn't between 302's and 5.0's. It's determined by application. Ford's larger vehicles generally use the large wheel, while smaller vehicles (like Fairmonts, Mustangs, and the like) use the smaller wheel. There are exceptions:

- All 351 engines use the large wheel regardless of vehicle.
- All vehicles equipped with an overdrive-type automatic use a large wheel.
- Mustang IIs (1975-1978) with a 302 use a unique 'extra small' wheel

When it comes to balance issues, it's much simpler:

302 prior to mid-1981: 28.2 oz-in balance scheme
302 mid-1981 & newer: 50 oz-in balance scheme.

Windsor-Fox makes a flywheel specifically for late 302s in early Mustangs, as well as the matching harmonic balancer.

However, to answer your original question: AFAIK the bellhousing should bolt up just fine...the bellhousing bolt pattern is the same.
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
ImageImageImage
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
mitchmc_13
New Member
New Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:28 pm

re: 1982 5.0L 302 and 1972 three speed tranny flywheel troub

Post by mitchmc_13 »

ok thanks!!! i knew all of the balancing issues with the 351's and 302's and with the 302's from different years. all i really needed to know is if this combination would work or not. My buddy has an extra tranny off of a 83' mustang and is willing to let me test fit the bell housing and the starter,but my feeling is that it will work.
User avatar
Hawkrod
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 939
Joined: Tue Mar 01, 2005 12:17 am
Location: Apple Valley, California
Contact:

re: 1982 5.0L 302 and 1972 three speed tranny flywheel troub

Post by Hawkrod »

Unfortunately the bellhousing for the late Mustang may not fit. Ford and Borg Warner went and changed the input shaft length on the trans and the later Mustangs have a pull type cable throw out bearing which can be converted to a truck push type but the length will still likely be wrong. What you need to find is a 65-67 Mustang, Falcon, or Fairlane small diameter bellhousing as it will work with the later small flywheel. Most people are actually trying to go the other way as they have the late model trans and bellhousing and are looking for a flywheel to fit the small bellhousing! Hawkrod
39 Ford Dlx Cpe
59 Tbird 430
60 Lincoln
(2)62 Tbirds
(3)68 Cougar XR7-G's
69 Cougar 428CJ 4 speed
77 1/2 F250 4X4
86 SVO
76 F250 Crew Cab
67 F250 Ranger
http://www.supermotors.org/registry/veh ... 9&detail=1
User avatar
sideoilerfe
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 804
Joined: Tue Sep 11, 2007 10:04 pm
Location: Oregon, Portland

re: 1982 5.0L 302 and 1972 three speed tranny flywheel troub

Post by sideoilerfe »

Or,


Sell the 302 you just bought and get a 300 6. More low end torque and more reliability. You'd just need FE towers, 6 cylinder gas pedal assembly and possibly a radiator.
Side oiler FE, see if you can catch me!!!

1970 F250 4x4 390/4spd
1968 F250 4X2 360/C6/No Rust!
mitchmc_13
New Member
New Member
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Aug 21, 2008 4:28 pm

re: 1982 5.0L 302 and 1972 three speed tranny flywheel troub

Post by mitchmc_13 »

So i recently picked up everything i thought i needed for the swap and it all bolted up perfectly. the bellhousing bolted rite up to the block and the tranny bolted rite up to the bellhousing. the old starter that was originally on the truck worked perfectly as well, so it will be used. I am dropping everything in today....so now we'll see how the engine actually runs. :thup:
Post Reply