C4 installation?
Moderators: FORDification, 70_F100
-
- New Member
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:51 am
- Location: Houston,TX
- Contact:
C4 installation?
I am gonna install a c4 to my 240 inline this weekend and I was wondering if I should bolt the torque convertor to the fly wheel 1st or to the tranny? Does it make any difference? Any tips maybe that could ease the process would be nice. Thanks
Camel Ciggarettes,John Deere and Ford "Hard To Beat"!!!!
-
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 22329
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Kansas, Ottawa
- Contact:
if the engine is in the truck i would put the whole trans togther including the torque converter and then put it in. i have also always filled the converter with fluid first . because it is quicker to refill the trans after its already in. plus some guys say it helps get flud to the bushing and front pump faster if its filled before the first start.
- FORDification
- Site & Forum Admin
- Posts: 8050
- Joined: Sun Jul 11, 2004 12:52 am
- Location: Kansas, Wellsville
- Contact:
re: C4 installation?
Definitely install the torque converter on the transmission first and then install the transmission.
____| \__
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
-O-----O- Keith
'67 F-100 2WD SWB ~ '69 F-100 4WD SWB w/7" chop ~ 1975 F-250 Ranger XLT Supercab Camper Special
My '67 restoration video
-> Posting and you! <-a MUST watch for all!!
-
- New Member
- Posts: 122
- Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 10:51 am
- Location: Houston,TX
- Contact:
re: C4 installation?
Thanks for the help. Any specific fluid I should be looking for?
Camel Ciggarettes,John Deere and Ford "Hard To Beat"!!!!
-
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 22329
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
- Location: Kansas, Ottawa
- Contact:
- basketcase0302
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 6805
- Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2006 7:11 am
- Location: Hawthorne, Florida
re: C4 installation?
jguajardotx,
When sliding the torque converter into the tranny bell-housing...
Make sure you "hear" three distinctive "clicks" as the two go together!
Did it/done it...I believe the third click has something to do with the transmission pump.
Also what these guys said for sure.
Jeff
When sliding the torque converter into the tranny bell-housing...
Make sure you "hear" three distinctive "clicks" as the two go together!
Did it/done it...I believe the third click has something to do with the transmission pump.
Also what these guys said for sure.
Jeff
Jeff
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=46251
SOLD-71 F-350 dually flatbed, 302 / .030 over V-8 with a "baby"C-6, B & M truckshifter, Dana70/4.11 ratio, intermittent wipers, tilt steering, full LED lighting on the flat bed, and no stereo yet (this way I can hear the rattles to diagnose)! SOLD!
Many Ford bumps / one 76' EB / and several dents through the years.
A lot of "oddball" Ford parts collected from working on them for 34 years now!
2008 Ford Escape 4 x 4
http://www.fordification.com/forum/view ... 22&t=46251
SOLD-71 F-350 dually flatbed, 302 / .030 over V-8 with a "baby"C-6, B & M truckshifter, Dana70/4.11 ratio, intermittent wipers, tilt steering, full LED lighting on the flat bed, and no stereo yet (this way I can hear the rattles to diagnose)! SOLD!
Many Ford bumps / one 76' EB / and several dents through the years.
A lot of "oddball" Ford parts collected from working on them for 34 years now!
2008 Ford Escape 4 x 4
-
- New Member
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:48 pm
- Location: Kansas City, MO
re: C4 installation? A different sort of problem....
I am going to hijack this post, as I am doing the same thing and made the following observation today:
My father and I installed a C4 in my 65 today. Good thing he was helping, as I would have never gotten it by myself and even then I think we kind of shoehorned it in.
The C4 I got was from a mustang with a 302. It has the large housing, flywheel (164 tooth) and 12" torque convertor. It also has the long tailshaft. Looks like a "conehead". It is a case fill transmission -- early C4's were panfill, but everything I have read says that casefill trannies are fine, so long as you have the right bell (which I have)
The C4 in 65 would have been a panfill.
The 65 shop manual, as well as chiltons makes installation/removal sound pretty easy. They didn't mention that it would hang up so bad on the firewall and mid crossmember that I needed to remove the tailhousing AND even then, still pry the bellhousing over the crossmember with brute force.....
We got it in. It was a royal bugger..... Even with the tailhousing off, the output shaft hits on the middle cab cross member and keeps you from tipping the tranny forward. This in turn means the bottom of the bell catches on the middle cross member and the top of the bell hits the firewall right forward of the hump cutout.
So my question. Can it be that C4 trannies in trucks ALL got the short tailhousing? I have seen pictures of them, and that is what is shown in my manual in ONE picture, though in another picture, it shows the long tailhousing (like from a car).
With a short tailhousing, I think this would have went in just as described in the manual.
If it is true that trucks got short tailhousings, then I can tell you now, there is a REALLY GOOD REASON TO STICK WITH THAT DECISION BY FOMOCO!!!!!!!!!!
My father and I installed a C4 in my 65 today. Good thing he was helping, as I would have never gotten it by myself and even then I think we kind of shoehorned it in.
The C4 I got was from a mustang with a 302. It has the large housing, flywheel (164 tooth) and 12" torque convertor. It also has the long tailshaft. Looks like a "conehead". It is a case fill transmission -- early C4's were panfill, but everything I have read says that casefill trannies are fine, so long as you have the right bell (which I have)
The C4 in 65 would have been a panfill.
The 65 shop manual, as well as chiltons makes installation/removal sound pretty easy. They didn't mention that it would hang up so bad on the firewall and mid crossmember that I needed to remove the tailhousing AND even then, still pry the bellhousing over the crossmember with brute force.....
We got it in. It was a royal bugger..... Even with the tailhousing off, the output shaft hits on the middle cab cross member and keeps you from tipping the tranny forward. This in turn means the bottom of the bell catches on the middle cross member and the top of the bell hits the firewall right forward of the hump cutout.
So my question. Can it be that C4 trannies in trucks ALL got the short tailhousing? I have seen pictures of them, and that is what is shown in my manual in ONE picture, though in another picture, it shows the long tailhousing (like from a car).
With a short tailhousing, I think this would have went in just as described in the manual.
If it is true that trucks got short tailhousings, then I can tell you now, there is a REALLY GOOD REASON TO STICK WITH THAT DECISION BY FOMOCO!!!!!!!!!!
65 f-100 SWB, 240 I6, T-18, now swapped to C4 with difficulty. Yeah, I know. Its a 67-72 site. But my frame and entire drive train are just like yours!!!!
- craftsman
- Preferred User
- Posts: 400
- Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 4:28 pm
- Location: Tennessee, Knoxville
That middle crossmember should have been removed for installation. You would have to drill out the rivots and reinstall with grade 8 bolts and nuts. The job would have been a lot easier. I don't think the length of the tailhousing is a big issue, you will probalbly have to have driveshaft modified to fit.
-
- New Member
- Posts: 178
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:48 pm
- Location: Kansas City, MO
OK, it seems to be true -- friends from over at fordtruk.com also verify that the middle crossmember between the radius arms needs to be removed (and later re-installed).
As we started, we immediately realized there was a problem, and then we went to the Shop Manual (a 65) and also a Chiltons and they said NOTHING about removing the middle cross member.
So we thought we were just missing something.
I still think it is possible that in 65 at least, the C4 trannys in trucks had the short, bolt on yoke tail housing. This would have been easier and probably worked as the shop manual indicated.
In any case, any future readers, BE FOREWARED! For an automatic transmission to be removed and installed, at least if it has a long tailhousing, I am now sure that you should grind out the rivets and remove the middle cross member as well.
As we started, we immediately realized there was a problem, and then we went to the Shop Manual (a 65) and also a Chiltons and they said NOTHING about removing the middle cross member.
So we thought we were just missing something.
I still think it is possible that in 65 at least, the C4 trannys in trucks had the short, bolt on yoke tail housing. This would have been easier and probably worked as the shop manual indicated.
In any case, any future readers, BE FOREWARED! For an automatic transmission to be removed and installed, at least if it has a long tailhousing, I am now sure that you should grind out the rivets and remove the middle cross member as well.
65 f-100 SWB, 240 I6, T-18, now swapped to C4 with difficulty. Yeah, I know. Its a 67-72 site. But my frame and entire drive train are just like yours!!!!