AOD Transmission & FE Engines
Moderators: FORDification, 70_F100
- ford7379trucks
- New Member
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 10:25 pm
re: AOD Transmission & FE Engines
you can get a moded aod that bolt up to a fe for $1,500 ill look for the link. the stock aod will fail but u can rebuild them to handel 1000hp
1967 F-250 CS(starts every time)
1998 jeep grand cherokee(pos)( glad i got the 67 to save my a**)
1982 Suzuki GS1100G zero to stupid in nothin flat
1998 jeep grand cherokee(pos)( glad i got the 67 to save my a**)
1982 Suzuki GS1100G zero to stupid in nothin flat
- averagef250
- 100% FORDified!
- Posts: 4387
- Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
- Location: Oregon, Beavercreek
Re: re: AOD Transmission & FE Engines
Everyone has thier own opinions. I feel I have a lot of real world experience with Ford trucks from '67 to present day and I think the 460 is far less than stellar and quite far below an FE in a truck.68Mercury250Ranger wrote: A 460 stock will run circles around a 360/390 .
I've had bone stock truck 360 2V motors that'd outpull most 460's out there and pass twice as many gas stations. If you have half a brain an FE is a very strong, very affordable truck engine.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
- ford7379trucks
- New Member
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2005 10:25 pm
re: AOD Transmission & FE Engines
this is the 1st time iv ever herd anything bad about the FE other then gas milage
1967 F-250 CS(starts every time)
1998 jeep grand cherokee(pos)( glad i got the 67 to save my a**)
1982 Suzuki GS1100G zero to stupid in nothin flat
1998 jeep grand cherokee(pos)( glad i got the 67 to save my a**)
1982 Suzuki GS1100G zero to stupid in nothin flat
-
- New Member
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2007 9:30 pm
- Location: Elmira, Ontario
Re: re: AOD Transmission & FE Engines
You are right everyone is entitled to their opinion, and theiraveragef250 wrote:Everyone has thier own opinions. I feel I have a lot of real world experience with Ford trucks from '67 to present day and I think the 460 is far less than stellar and quite far below an FE in a truck.68Mercury250Ranger wrote: A 460 stock will run circles around a 360/390 .
I've had bone stock truck 360 2V motors that'd outpull most 460's out there and pass twice as many gas stations. If you have half a brain an FE is a very strong, very affordable truck engine.
A 360 outpull a 460? thats an interesting concept.
My sister had a 1970 F250 camperspecial with only 9*,*** original miles. A (healthy?) 360 ran good, put new timing chain, gears, oil pump, installed a 390 4barrel intake and rebuilt 600 holley.
drove it for several months, had decent power but couldn't pull a loaded cartrailer well. 12mpg empty, 8-9mpg pulling trailer.
Pulled out a 460 4barrel with 250,*** miles from a scrap yard fresh 1977 E350 cube van, (no oil smoke/no wierd noises) put new timing chain/gears, oil pump, and reused the rebuilt 600holley. Same trans internals, just change the front housing .
WOW unbelievable! it could smolder the 235/85/16s with the same Dana 60 3.54 posi. 14-15mpg empty. and 9-10 pulling same trailer, and it could get up the hills.
It brought the truck from a traffic hazard to a highway cruiser . and it made the 5.0 mustang boys take notice. Oh yeah same 2.25" dual exhaust.
Best $300 I ever spent. I installed it for free and even payed for the motor.
The family mechanic
4BT instead of 360 woohoo
Collecting 67-72 Ford/Mercury trucks since 1980, collecting 73-79s since 1990 when the 67-72s started drying up. Now I'm culling the herd. None of my 67-72 will ever be for sale! They will need a big hole in the ground.
- lightning_msd
- Preferred User
- Posts: 403
- Joined: Sun Nov 19, 2006 2:57 pm
- Location: Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada
- Contact:
Re: re: AOD Transmission & FE Engines
you can build a 410 out of a 360/390...68Mercury250Ranger wrote:Hey nobody is wrong. Some are just more right.
Seriously I would love to put another FE in my 68 Merc, but it sure wouldn't be a 360 or 390. I'm still watching for an old 410 or a 428.
I missed out on a couple basket case 427SOHC motors that came with enough extra parts to complete almost 3 engines. Oh yeah that was over 20 yrs ago.
This place is a wealth of information .
1967 F100 "Lexxi" 352
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?album=482
http://www.fordification.com/galleries/ ... ?album=482
-
- New Member
- Posts: 61
- Joined: Sun Aug 26, 2007 1:46 pm
- Location: Kissimmee, Florida
re: AOD Transmission & FE Engines
OK, riddle me this Batman.......
If you can get an adapter plate to make the AOD fit the FE, or said a different way, you can get an adapter plate to make a transmission with a small block bellhousing pattern bolt up to the FE, then would I be correct is saying that with the same adapter plate you could put a M5R2 5 speed overdrive behind a FE engine?
Is my logic correct?
Jeff
actually, let me start this as its own thread otherwise...
If you can get an adapter plate to make the AOD fit the FE, or said a different way, you can get an adapter plate to make a transmission with a small block bellhousing pattern bolt up to the FE, then would I be correct is saying that with the same adapter plate you could put a M5R2 5 speed overdrive behind a FE engine?
Is my logic correct?
Jeff
actually, let me start this as its own thread otherwise...
Last edited by uboughtwhat? on Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
When my truck grows up, it wants to be a Crew Cab like Teacherman's
- DuckRyder
- Moderator
- Posts: 4924
- Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2004 3:04 pm
- Location: Scruffy City
- Contact:
Re: re: AOD Transmission & FE Engines
[/quote]uboughtwhat? wrote:OK, riddle me this Batman.......
If you can get an adapter plate to make the AOD fit the FE, or said a different way, you can get an adapter plate to make a transmission with a small block bellhousing pattern bolt up to the FE, then would I be correct is saying that with the same adapter plate you could put a M5R2 5 speed overdrive behind a FE engine?
Is my logic correct?
Jeff
I'm not saying it is impossible, but it ain't going to be easy...
The first problem that comes to mind is supporting the input shaft, normally it would be supported by the pilot bearing, but the adapter is going to move it back... that would have to be addressed without impacting the clutch operation...
Robert
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper
1972 F100 Ranger XLT (445/C6/9” 3.50 Truetrac)
"An unarmed man can only flee from evil, and evil is not overcome by fleeing from it." -- Jeff Cooper