1965 240-six

Clutch, transmission, rear axle

Moderators: FORDification, 70_F100

Post Reply
Retiredfire
New Member
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:04 am

1965 240-six

Post by Retiredfire »

What Rear end would be good for the highway. Ithink it as alow now . This is a old Air Force Pickup. I am NEW to Message Form.
fordman
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 22329
Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2005 8:17 pm
Location: Kansas, Ottawa
Contact:

Post by fordman »

what does it have now as far as the rear end and the transmission?
cdherman
New Member
New Member
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:48 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO

Post by cdherman »

Depends a lot on your tire size. Assuming you have some tranny that has a 1:1 top gear, and assuming that you are not wanting to do much towing, then 3:00 or 3.25 are some possible choices for highway use.

But like I said, tire size will matter a lot. I have a 4 speed, with a 240, a 3.25 rear and 7x15 bias sized radials. That gets me about 2700 rpm at 70mph. Tollerable, but I will probably go with a 3.00 eventually, as I never tow.
65 f-100 SWB, 240 I6, T-18, now swapped to C4 with difficulty. Yeah, I know. Its a 67-72 site. But my frame and entire drive train are just like yours!!!!
tod-hog
New Member
New Member
Posts: 72
Joined: Sat Aug 27, 2005 2:34 pm
Location: Oklahoma

re: 1965 240-six

Post by tod-hog »

I have a 240/ 3 spd with 3.70 & 235/75/15 and she runs just fine @ 70 mph.
Retiredfire
New Member
New Member
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2007 6:04 am

re: 1965 240-six

Post by Retiredfire »

I have a 3 speed tranmission. 225 /15 tires radials Ihave check to check the rear end.
User avatar
MadMaxetc
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: Kansas, Wichita
Contact:

Post by MadMaxetc »

In my 73 I had my 300 / 3-speed / 3.00:1 rear gears.

She did fine on the highway, but didn't like to haul that big a load. It was a 1/2 ton so towing what not realy its job anyway.

I would find some 3:25s or 3:00. I would not go any higher than that.
Dan

Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4 / Work In Progress!
Daily Driver: '67 F-250 Converted to F-100 LWB / 300 / T-5 / 9" 3.70:1 / 235/75R15 Tires
1/4 mile in 17.64s @ 75mph (it's 4200lbs!!!)
"Work Harder! Millions On Welfare Depend On YOU!!"

FORD Girl

Photobucket Pictures
User avatar
averagef250
100% FORDified!
100% FORDified!
Posts: 4387
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 12:58 am
Location: Oregon, Beavercreek

Post by averagef250 »

I wouldn't go any taller than 3.50's. I blew up a 3.50 rear in a 70 F-100 with a 240/4 speed years ago. Replaced the rear with a 3.25 geared one and hated it. It was no easy feat getting moving on a hill.
1970 F-250 4x4 original Willock swivel frame chassis '93 5.9 Cummins/Getrag/NP205/HP60/D70
User avatar
MadMaxetc
Blue Oval Fanatic
Blue Oval Fanatic
Posts: 850
Joined: Wed Jan 03, 2007 10:48 pm
Location: Kansas, Wichita
Contact:

Post by MadMaxetc »

Ya I would say if you have Hills / Mountains you should not go past a 3.50:1.

However, he is in TX and they realy don't have bad Hills...a 3.25:1 should be good.
Dan

Project: '63 F-100 LWB / 460 / C6 / 2x4 / Work In Progress!
Daily Driver: '67 F-250 Converted to F-100 LWB / 300 / T-5 / 9" 3.70:1 / 235/75R15 Tires
1/4 mile in 17.64s @ 75mph (it's 4200lbs!!!)
"Work Harder! Millions On Welfare Depend On YOU!!"

FORD Girl

Photobucket Pictures
cdherman
New Member
New Member
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2005 9:48 pm
Location: Kansas City, MO

Post by cdherman »

Yes, its worth noting that my decision to move to a 3.00 rear is partly due to the fact that I am also going with a C4 automatic tranny. The torque convertor in an automatic tranny helps you get started even if the bottom gear is too high.

As it stands, I have a t-18. Discounting first gear (rediculuosly low and capable pulling stumps etc) getting started in 2nd requires some clutch slippage with the current 3.25 rear if I am headed up hill. First gear certainly is easy enough to get started in, but the near immediate need for an upshift makes you feel like a traffic hazard at every red light.

Only useful thing about 1st gear in a t-18 in traffic is that you can let out the clutch with the engine idleing at 800 rpm and it won't kill it -- it just crawls forward -- marginally useful when stopped traffic moves forward a few feet, but otherwise not much.
65 f-100 SWB, 240 I6, T-18, now swapped to C4 with difficulty. Yeah, I know. Its a 67-72 site. But my frame and entire drive train are just like yours!!!!
Post Reply